If you have read that, then you must understand that. Kevin Rashid Johnson is by far the best at disagreeing with Maoism-Third Worldism. Maoism-Third Worldism will only further advance in theory by studying the work of those who are better at criticizing us. As it goes, Kevin Rashid Johnson is good at disagreeing, but he has no true argument. The study of the straw man attacks by Kevin Rashid Johnson will be essential for anyone truly attempting to take up Maoism-Third Worldism as a study. Now that we got that out of the way, we wish to say that Jason Unruhe destroyed Kevin Rashid Johnson, this is evident when you read this: https://maoistrebelnews.com/2015/05/08/kevin-rashid-and-first-worldism-straw-men-are-easy-to-kill/
Marxism-Leninism is called such because Leninism is Marxism updated.
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is called such because Maoism is Marxism-Leninism updated.
Maoism-Third Worldism is called such because Third Worldism is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism updated.
Third Worldism is Maoism-Third Worldism. Maoism-Third Worldism is a sort way of saying Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Third Worldism.
One of the greatest confusions is that some do not understand the difference between Maoism and Mao Zedong Thought. Mao Zedong Thought was Marxism-Leninism applied to feudal China. Maoism is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Just to avoid any other common confusions; Marxism-Leninism is rarely referred to as simply Leninism because when anyone says "Leninism" this could also mean Trotskyism to several people.
Third Worldism started with the Maoist Internationalist Movement and was furthered by the Leading Light Communist Organization. It is essential to study of the works of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong - a proper study of both Lin Biao and Abimael Guzmán should be taken up first. Then a study of the written work of the Maoist Internationalist Movement and the Leading Light Communist Organization will depart to the student a true understanding of Third Worldism. The Maoist Internationalist Movement made great breakthroughs in revolutionary science but it destroyed it self with a lot of strange ideas that caused it to fracture badly, several correct ideas came from the Maoist Internationalist Movement, several incorrect ideas also came from the Maoist Internationalist Movement. The Leading Light Communist Organization was the true inheritor of the Maoist Internationalist Movement much advancements came from this organization. Anyone who wishes to join the Leading Light Communist Organization should, but we who have built this blog for you to get started hope that you will remain independent from the LLCO and any of the offshoots of MIM. It really needs to be Third Worlders who take up the responsibility of becoming Third Worldists, they must build Vanguard Parties. The First Worlders who become Third Worldists have the responsibility of aiding the Third World Revolutionaries while also sabotaging their own First World Countries.
We who make this blog do so to give anyone truly interested in Maoism-Third Worldism an correct introduction. We are Third Worldists and we meet up with our rivals who we deeply respect, we meet up four times a year. Our respected rivals are none other than Marxist-Leninist-Maoists. This is the blog of those Maoists: https://marxistleninistmaoisttheory.blogspot.com/ we deeply respect our rivals. This is what they say about Third Worldism: https://marxistleninistmaoisttheory.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-we-think-about-maoism-third.html we disagree with the idea that M3W is MLM defeatism. The true divide between Maosm-Third Worldism and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is that we Third Worldists reject the book Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat by J. Sakai and we agree with many points in Divided World Divided Class by Zak Cope. Our Maoist rivals on the other hand disagree with most every conclusion of Zak Cope's masterpiece, instead agreeing with most points in J. Sakai's outdated book. Some of the most basic statements in J. Sakai's Settlers book are very much true but the conclusions of that book are ultimately false. To be fair to our Maoist rivals, they do not treat Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat by J. Sakai like their manifesto, just as we don't treat Divided World Divided Class by Zak Cope as our manifesto.
No comments:
Post a Comment