First Worldism: an Infantile Disorder

In the First World it is actually Anarchists that are doing more today than so-called Marxists.

Eurocentric leftists accuse Maoism-Third Worldism of being revisionist. Eurocentric Marxists slap the revisionist label on Maoism-Third Worldism, yet in truth it is these very same eurocentric Marxists who actually are a bunch of revisionists. The uncomfortable truth is that the First World working class takes part in the oppression of workers in the Third World. The surplus value of the workers in the Third World is given to the First World costumer service workers to feed First World Consumerism. It is true that the surplus value of costumer service workers in the First World is also stolen to further the wealth of Corporations, but this is very much not a Proletarian issue, it is an issue of the aristocracy of labor that demands more of the stolen labor that they "earned" by working in costumer service. First Worldism is the denial of these basic facts. First Worldists do not even recognize who the marginalized Proletarians of the First World even are, they can't bring themselves to do this because to do so is to admit some unconformable truths. The First World Lumpenproletariat are not part of the costumer service aristocracy of labor, the First World Lumpenproletariat are those who live in Jim Crow Louisiana and the Native Americans who live in Third World conditions. Although the First Worldists do not wish it to be so, the First World Lumpenproletariat are those in U.S prison system. One of the other problems is that even though it is the Lumpenproletariat which actually are the ones in the First World with the truest revolutionary potential, the lumpenization of the First World working class is a danger. This is because of the way the drugs fill the streets and how docile drug addicts are when it comes to the notions of revolutionary class struggle. 

First Worldists you need to think about something, go to almost any supermarket store. Most all of the clothing is made by people you are told not to care about. Before you ask where your stolen surplus value went, maybe you should ask who had their surplus value stolen to make you all of these nice clothes. While you are screaming to yourselves about Identity Politics and how bad the new Joker movie is because it raises the issue of class, someone went through a lot of trouble to make you nice clothing. The Third World is Proletariat. First Worldism is an Infantile Disorder, except this.

First Worldism rejects genuine Marxism, eurocentricity and neocolonialism are the two major tendencies of First Worldism.The First World Lumpenproletariat is not even fully class conscious. COINTELPRO has mostly neutralized the First World Lumpen. To be fair to our Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Comrades which just happen to be our rivals as well as our allies; they do not understand how outdated they actually are, they are not First Worldists. If a Socialist is not Third Worldist this does not automatically mean that he or she is First Worldist, this only means that such a Socialist is outdated or without the more updated line. Maoists (real Maoists) are not First Worldists, yet they are not as dialectical as Third Worldists. Hoxhaism is a perfect example of First Worldism. The basic Hoxhaist rejection of Mao Zedong is extremely grounded in eurocentricity, Hoxhaists are almost always extremely racist. Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (authentic Marxism-Leninism-Maoism that is) is much better than Marxism-Leninism which is terribly out of date. To dare say that First Worlders struggle at the same level that Third Worlders struggle is counter-revolutionary. Most every so-called Socialist in the First World is a counter-revolutionary. Marxism in the First World is a delusion. Many self-identified Marxist-Leninists living in the United States believe that the answer to bringing revolution is to join forces with reactionary gangbangers, simply because they have guns. Anarchists in the United States actually do street fighting, this makes them more revolutionary than the so-called Marxist-Leninists in the First World. First Worldism is politically parasitic. Maoism-Third Worldism is the highest stage of the revolutionary science, First Worldism is an Infantile Disorder, there is no genuine argument against this. The only thing that First Worldists care about is free stuff.