Essentials of Maoism-Third Worldism

This blog is called Maoism-Third Worldism.
Maoism-Third Worldism is the highest stage of the revolutionary science called Marxism.
The first stage of Marxism is ordinary Marxism.
The second stage of Marxism is called Marxism-Leninism. 
The third stage of Marxism is called Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Thus it must be grasped that Maoism-Third Worldism is the fourth stage of Marxism.

We would kindly request that anyone who reads this blog post; read the eleven first blog posts that we have written before proceeding with this blog post. The first blog post that we have written is called simply Maoism-Third Worldism, hence the name of our first post has the same name as our blog.
Blog post 1: Maoism-Third Worldism
Blog post 2: What should Maoist-Third Worldists make of Jason Unruhe?
Blog post 3: Revolution in the Third World; Resistance in the First World
Blog post 4: The ridiculous hairsplitting has forced us into resorting to Blogger.
Blog post 5: What is Americanism?
Blog post 6: Synthesis of Treason 
Blog post 7: Maoism-Third Worldism is better than Marxism-Leninism-Maoism 
Blog post 8: The Transgender Question 
Blog post 9: Social Alienation in the First World 
Blog post 10: The Nation-State has failed to be Proletariat 
Blog post 11: First Worldism: an Infantile Disorder 


This is the last post for this blog. Anyone interested in more of our work can check out our two other blogs Internationalist Resistance Guard and Global Revolutionary Shining Path.  

The first thing to grasp about Maoist-Third Worldist Theory and Practice is that it has nothing to do with the Three Worlds Theory in fact we reject that theory as reactionary and revisionist. Before we review the essentials of Maoism-Third Worldism we need to form the parameters of context.

One of the reasons why Leninists typically refer to themselves by the full description Marxist-Leninists is because many Trotskyists refer to themselves as Leninists, so to avoid confusion Leninists typically call themselves Marxist-Leninist. Another reason why Leninists call themselves Marxist-Leninists and their theory and practice of Marxism is because Marxism-Leninism is a set of words stating that Leninism is updated Marxism.

Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is not Mao Zedong Thought. Mao Zedong Thought is the Chinese communist variety of Marxism–Leninism that Mao Zedong developed for realizing a socialist revolution in the agricultural, pre-industrial society of the People's Republic of China. To learn more about Marxism-Leninism-Maoism please see this post by a blogging alliance of Marxist-Leninist-Maoists: https://marxistleninistmaoisttheory.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html it was written by our rivals/allies. Keep in mind that Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is updated Marxism-Leninism in other words Maoism is updated Leninism. So if someone is a Maoist this means that that person is a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist.

Maoism-Third Worldism is a shorter way of saying Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Third Worldism. Maoism-Third Worldism is updated Marxism-Leninism-Maoism. When we say that we are Third Worldists we are saying that we are Maoist-Third Worldists (Marxist-Leninist-Maoist-Third Worldists) which is the same thing as saying; "Third Worldsim is updated Maoism" we Third Worldists are largely misunderstood, we are also typically the targets of slander by other so-called Marxists.

Now we can bring to you the essentials of Maoism-Third Worldism

This blog only serves the purpose of propagating Maoism-Third Worldism. While it is true that the origins of Maoism-Third Worldism are rather vague, the earliest manifestation of Maoism-Third Worldism is the Maoist Internationalist Movement. We encourage people to learn from the Maoist Internationalist Movement archives that you can view here: https://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/ we Third Worldists who work to write you these blog posts, take most of our theory from the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM). We however do not embrace MIM dogmatically, MIM has put out reactionary stuff before, the idea that "all sex is rape" is the one that haunts most every Third Worldist. Maoism-Third Worldism was further developed by the Leading Light Communist Organization, you can view their website here: https://llco.org/ we do pull a significant amount of our theories from the Leading Light Communist Organization (LLCO) because a bunch of their work is correct. We deeply respect the LLCO and the contributions that they have made over the years, but we find them to be at times overwhelmingly simplistic in their line, yet at the very same time a great deal of their work is so overwhelmingly factual that only a reactionary would reject all they have had to say outright. If people reading this blog wish to join the LLCO then they should do so, the LLCO is actually doing much better in their collective organized actions than they ever had in the past. Then there is Jason Unruhe the Maoist Rebel, without him Maoism-Third Worldism may never have gotten more known to the public. Jason Unruhe started his News Network in 2009, he used to be a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist but he now a Maoist-Third Worldist, you can find Jason Unruhe's website here: https://maoistrebelnews.com/ just like MIM and the LLCO we do not agree with everything said by Jason Unruhe the Maoist Rebel, yet we wish to proclaim that he has forwarded the correct ideas, he is principled and truthful. Jason Unruhe was honest as a Maoist and he is honest as a Third Worldist, he popularized Maoism-Third Worldism, he definitely takes a lot of his views from the LLCO, but to be perfectly honest he is propagating Third Worldism better than the LLCO. We would rather that the Third World Proletariat themselves start their own Third Worldist Vanguard Parties than rely on the LLCO. More people in the Third World watch Maoist Rebel News than attempt to align with the LLCO. Our strongest suggestion to both the Third World and the First World is read the first eleven blog posts we have put out for educational purposes, then to study works of MIM, then study works of the LLCO and learn as much as you can from Jason Unruhe; then from there it becomes a matter of responsibility to further the theories of Maoism-Third Worldism with contributions and serious work. Third Worldists practice criticism and self-criticism. So we will give a criticism of MIM, the LLCO and Jason Unruhe; in that order. But first we shall criticism of ourselves.

Criticizing ourselves.
We should have given fuller investigation into the claims of other Marxists a long time ago. We have failed to study new developing Socialist movements. We have been dismissive when Leninists attempt to explain new ideas to us, we have been reactionary in this way. Our dismissal of Leninist Comrades led to their deaths by Police in Arizona. We can never let this happen again. 

We confess to ignoring people who wanted to learn about the Third Worldist line; because such people usually learned of Third Worldism from Jason Unruhe. We have been rather embarrassed by Jason Unruhe, we have always known a great deal about him because we remember him when he started in 2009. Since 2018 we have done much to correct ourselves in this regard. We have to confess that Jason Unruhe has made the most significant contributions, we have been guilty of jealousy and spite. The truth is Jason Unruhe actually saved the reputation of Maoism-Third Worldism when it was under assault.


Criticizing Maoist Internationalist Movement.
As much as we draw from MIM we deeply criticize their disbanding and their over defensiveness when fake Maoists would attack them. Plus it is not spite to confront the lies of Cult leaders simply because they are more popular, MIM wasted a lot of time responding to every attack that fake Maoist made upon them yet they had the means to warn others about Cult leaders but failed to do so out of fear of what First Worldists might say.

MIM dropped the Third Worldist line. In desperate hopes that First Worldists would become more gentle MIM stopped developing theory concerning the global class divide. The remnants of MIM have put to much emphasis on Settlers by J. Sakai a flawed book that needs to be rewritten.


Criticizing the Leading Light Communist Organization.
The LLCO still suffers from a type of disconnection from many groups in the Third World. Third Worldism must be picked up by the Third World not preached by those wishing to spread Leading Light Communist theory. The structure of Third Worldism was truly established by the LLCO, to deny this is dishonest. The LLCO is not the Vanguard of Third Worldism.

The LLCO needs to be criticized for pretending that Jim Crow conditions in the Southern States of the USA are a thing of the past. The First World Lumpenproletariat still matters. To be fair this is more the fault of Commander Prairie Fire. We should all recognize the contributions of Commander Prairie Fire, Third Worldism would not have been realized the way that it is today without his work; recognizing this it is time to put into question a great deal of the statistics that he propagated. 


Criticizing Jason Unruhe.
Jason Unruhe fails to recognize his importance. While it is true Jason Unruhe started as an amateur. Jason Unruhe is the guy putting out the most important content, there are even revolutionaries in the Third World watching him, he clearly has no idea that he is viewed by Third Worlders, that they may even take him more seriously than the LLCO.

Jason Unruhe needs to work with Trans-skeptics and even Trans-deniers. We again redirect readers to Blog post 8: The Transgender Question  Trans people have more to fear from Trans activists that censor them from questioning their transgenderism than they have to fear from Jason Unruhe. Being trans-skeptical is not the same as being transphobic. Being a trans-denier is not the same as being a transphobe. It is obvious that Jason Unruhe is either trans-skeptical or trans-denying. Trans-denial is not transphobia. Trans-skeptical is not transphobia. Jason Unruhe should stop being scared of Trans activists, they don't even speak for the Trans Community; the Trans Community is gender questioning, the activism has been the source of the confusion inside the Trans Community.
There is no material argument for being Trans. Most Trans people who commit suicide do so shortly after transition. Most murders of Trans people happen with Police participation not by Jason Unruhe, it is time for Jason Unruhe to stand up to those that insist on bullying him.
 

The facts that other Marxists never want to hear remain true, this truth has been said before, we did not originate these words, they are true and difficult for First Worldists to except;
Maoism-Third Worldism reaffirms historical materialism, i.e. that the struggle between groups over their relationship to the means of producing and distributing wealth is the chief factor which shapes history. All economic wealth is the product of labor. Under capitalism, wealth becomes concentrated in fewer and fewer hands to the detriment of producers. This contradiction between the proletariat, the class for which the struggle against capitalism represents “nothing to lose but chains and a world to win,” and exploiters is not resolvable under capitalism. All things, including the social world, are in a process of development. The question of what direction the world will develop depends on class struggle. The basic choice facing humanity today is between socialism and communism or widespread ruin. Substantive progressive change to the capitalist system can not come from political reforms. Rather, the proletariat must organize to seize the instruments of production and construct their own state-forms to suppress reactionaries and carry through the revolution. The struggle against capitalism and for socialism is representative of the immediate necessity of an entire class and exemplifies an even larger range of interests. Yet this is not always demonstrated in the direct struggles waged by particular groups of the proletariat. Proletariat political consciousness is that which recognizes and organizes around the long-term strategic and tactical interests of the proletariat as a class. It is born from wider experiences of class struggle, and it is often brought to the proletarian masses by its most conscious elements or from without. Everything reflects in some manner extant social relations. The state, culture, art and day-to-day interactions are field of struggle in which different lines of understanding based on either proletarian class consciousness or reactionary ideology play out. Maoism-Third Worldism promotes the revolutionary struggle to seize power both over the means of production and every aspect of the superstructure as well. Socialism is transitional period between the formal overthrow of capitalism under the leadership of the proletariat to the restructuring of society based on the democratic and rational control over the production and allocation of use values, without oppression, classes or a state. The growth of the productive forces combined with historically-enshrined and militarily-enforced monopoly/imperialist advantages renders the contradiction between the proletariat and capital as one between exploiter and exploited nations. Hence, the principal contradiction today is between the masses of peripheral and semiperipheral countries on one hand and exploiter classes tied to capitalism-imperialism on the other. A revolution on the part of the Third World’s masses would in fact be a world revolution, as much of the value captured by the First World today is produced in the Third World. Imperialism renders entire local, national and regional economies of the core as primarily parasitic and dependent on the exploitation of the wider peripheral and semiperipheral zones. This necessarily alters the terrain of class struggle. Specifically, imperialism pays qualitatively higher wages to a minority of workers. This has both an economic function in maintaining capital accumulation in the core at the expense of the masses of the Third World and an ideological function by “bribing” these workers into supporting imperialism. First World and “middle class” workers who receive wages above the abstract value of labor, i.e. above the value of the goods and services exchanged throughout the world economy in a given period divided by the quantity of labor through which it is produced, are not part of the proletariat because the magnitude of their wages are dependent on imperialist exploitation and could not be maintained without it. Hence, Maoism-Third Worldism opposes all economism on behalf of workers in imperialist countries. Protracted people’s war complimented by the mass line, as demonstrated in the Chinese Revolution and creatively applied to particular situations, is the best suited means of revolutionary struggle in peripheral and semiperipheral countries. The notion of waging class struggle must be considered globally as well. Chinese revolutionary Lin Biao noted that the imperialist First World represented the “cities of the world” and that the exploited Third World the “countryside of the world.” Given the vast underdevelopment of the Third World at the hands of the First World, the struggle of the world’s masses is not immediately one for socialism but for global new democracy. This demands the hemming in and wide-ranging defeat of imperialism by an international proletariat-led coalition of progressive classes and the building of the requisite productive forces, class alliances and consciousness to continue the struggle for socialism and communism. Socialism is not a straight line towards communism. Rather, due to leftover attitudes and oppression, privileges which accompany positions of authority and the existence of capitalist blocs, the structural possibility remains for the generation of a “new bourgeoisie” under socialism which will attempt to seize power, halt class struggle, and unite to make accommodations with remaining reactionaries. The only solution is the continuation of class struggle under socialism to the end of countering and routing these efforts at the restoration of capitalism. This is the only means to continue towards communism. The participation of women is paramount for the success of the struggles for people’s war, global new democracy, socialism and communism. Women make up over half of the proletariat and form the backbone of our ability to reach and transform the day-to-day lives of the masses through struggle. As a paradigmatic shift, the struggle for socialism and communism must take a totally different approach to humanity’s relationship the the natural environment. Under socialism and communism, the preservation and enhancement of natural abundance for the common good will take precedence over the profit-seeking interest of the few. Moreover, people’s relationship with non-human life must more closely resemble the relationship that we strive to achieve between ourselves. The struggle for proletarian revolution must support and find common cause with the struggle for liberation and self-determination of oppressed nations. Within imperialist cores, the struggle for national liberation should be promoted as a detachment of the wider struggle for global new democracy, socialism and communism. The semantic application of Maoism-Third Worldism and the above terminology are not so important. What is important is that the above lessons are internalized and put into practice by revolutionary movements today. The struggle against capitalism-imperialism is a life or death matter for a large portion of the world’s people. The wider program of proletarian revolution touches on all aspects of life and carries which it the long-term interest of humanity itself. For these reasons, it is important that Marxism today, revolutionary science, draws from the history of class struggle the best understandings available. Capitalism-imperialism will not fall on its own, but it can be defeated. Enlightened by the lessons of previous class struggle and carried out in concert with a broad united front against imperialism, proletarian-led revolutionary struggles can defeat capitalism-imperialism, lay the foundations of socialism and embark on the road to communism.

UPHOLD MARXISM-LENINISM-MAOISM-THIRD WORLDISM ! ! !

First Worldism: an Infantile Disorder

In the First World it is actually Anarchists that are doing more today than so-called Marxists.

Eurocentric leftists accuse Maoism-Third Worldism of being revisionist. Eurocentric Marxists slap the revisionist label on Maoism-Third Worldism, yet in truth it is these very same eurocentric Marxists who actually are a bunch of revisionists. The uncomfortable truth is that the First World working class takes part in the oppression of workers in the Third World. The surplus value of the workers in the Third World is given to the First World costumer service workers to feed First World Consumerism. It is true that the surplus value of costumer service workers in the First World is also stolen to further the wealth of Corporations, but this is very much not a Proletarian issue, it is an issue of the aristocracy of labor that demands more of the stolen labor that they "earned" by working in costumer service. First Worldism is the denial of these basic facts. First Worldists do not even recognize who the marginalized Proletarians of the First World even are, they can't bring themselves to do this because to do so is to admit some unconformable truths. The First World Lumpenproletariat are not part of the costumer service aristocracy of labor, the First World Lumpenproletariat are those who live in Jim Crow Louisiana and the Native Americans who live in Third World conditions. Although the First Worldists do not wish it to be so, the First World Lumpenproletariat are those in U.S prison system. One of the other problems is that even though it is the Lumpenproletariat which actually are the ones in the First World with the truest revolutionary potential, the lumpenization of the First World working class is a danger. This is because of the way the drugs fill the streets and how docile drug addicts are when it comes to the notions of revolutionary class struggle. 

First Worldists you need to think about something, go to almost any supermarket store. Most all of the clothing is made by people you are told not to care about. Before you ask where your stolen surplus value went, maybe you should ask who had their surplus value stolen to make you all of these nice clothes. While you are screaming to yourselves about Identity Politics and how bad the new Joker movie is because it raises the issue of class, someone went through a lot of trouble to make you nice clothing. The Third World is Proletariat. First Worldism is an Infantile Disorder, except this.

First Worldism rejects genuine Marxism, eurocentricity and neocolonialism are the two major tendencies of First Worldism.The First World Lumpenproletariat is not even fully class conscious. COINTELPRO has mostly neutralized the First World Lumpen. To be fair to our Marxist-Leninist-Maoist Comrades which just happen to be our rivals as well as our allies; they do not understand how outdated they actually are, they are not First Worldists. If a Socialist is not Third Worldist this does not automatically mean that he or she is First Worldist, this only means that such a Socialist is outdated or without the more updated line. Maoists (real Maoists) are not First Worldists, yet they are not as dialectical as Third Worldists. Hoxhaism is a perfect example of First Worldism. The basic Hoxhaist rejection of Mao Zedong is extremely grounded in eurocentricity, Hoxhaists are almost always extremely racist. Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (authentic Marxism-Leninism-Maoism that is) is much better than Marxism-Leninism which is terribly out of date. To dare say that First Worlders struggle at the same level that Third Worlders struggle is counter-revolutionary. Most every so-called Socialist in the First World is a counter-revolutionary. Marxism in the First World is a delusion. Many self-identified Marxist-Leninists living in the United States believe that the answer to bringing revolution is to join forces with reactionary gangbangers, simply because they have guns. Anarchists in the United States actually do street fighting, this makes them more revolutionary than the so-called Marxist-Leninists in the First World. First Worldism is politically parasitic. Maoism-Third Worldism is the highest stage of the revolutionary science, First Worldism is an Infantile Disorder, there is no genuine argument against this. The only thing that First Worldists care about is free stuff.   

The Nation-State has failed to be Proletariat

The Nation-State was the fabrication of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. We need to fix our dialectics, Karl Marx made mistakes, he thought that revolution would happen in the advanced Countries, the exact opposite happened, instead it was the backward Countries that brought the waves of revolution. Marxism is the Science of Revolution, not a religion. Karl Marx was Hegelian. Hegelianism is incorrect, even Colonialist. When we look into the history of Nations honestly, we do not find them attached to Countries. Even though Otto Bauer was a revisionist, this does not mean he was always incorrect. Even though Vladimir Lenin was a true revolutionary as well as the truest Marxist that ever lived during his time, this does not mean he was always correct. There are flaws in Joseph Stalin's book Marxism and the National Question to add insult to injury the entire book seems to be too obsessed with denouncing the Jewish Bund. The Bolsheviks support for Zionism was founded upon incorrect ideas, dogmas and even eurocentricity. Maybe if the Bolsheviks had been with the Jewish Bund on a few things perhaps they would not have allied with so many revisionist and reactionary forces. We don't know that much about Modern Bundism but our Maoist Comrades do. Clarifying a few matters; our Maoist Comrades happen to be both - ally and rival - to our theoretical works and practices, we can and will adopt anything applicable that comes from their work. They definitely adopt from Third Worldism, they recognize that there is a Global Class divide. 

To put this as plainly as possible, Maoists are always more concerned with Colonialism while we Third Worldists pay more attention to Imperialism. Third Worldists do care about the problem of Colonialism, but destroying Imperialism is more important. Maoists are very serious when it comes to fighting Imperialism, while Maoists object to any charge that they treat Colonialism as more of a primary contradiction, this is still what they are doing. Our Maoist Comrades have made a serious contribution by adopting the theory of Proletarian Federated-State, this rejection of Nation-State is long overdue. We adopt this concept, the only thing that will solve the historical enmity between Syrians and Kurds will not be solved with a Kurdish Nation-State that oppresses other nationalities, having a Syrian Nation-State that does not fully recognize the autonomy of the Kurdish will only push them (the Kurdish that is) to aid Imperialism out of desperation for independence. We saw this same problem with the Jewish Bund, they may have taken on a more correct line had they not been so carelessly cast out by the Bolsheviks, pushing them into the arms of reactionaries. Together the Syrians and the Kurds will need to share a Federated-State, perhaps then both Nations will have a growing class consciousness that will lead to a Proletarian Federated-State. Maoism requires the study of the original Black Panther Party, the original Black Panther Party understood themselves to be of a Nationality in a similar way to that of the European Jews, our Maoist Comrades keep pointing out the idea that the Black Panthers were in effect practicing national-cultural autonomy, the more we investigate this the more correct this turns out to be. 

 We truly don't know enough about Modern Bundism to say whether we agree with their line, but we are well aware of the growing reputation of Dr. Weizfeld, Dona Newman and Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua. The murder of the five council members of the Bundist Movement led to the murder of every single member of the Proletarian Revolutionary Front. We used to have intense debates with the Proletarian Revolutionary Front, they were Marxist-Leninists and they were very serious about revolution, even though they lived the lives of First Worlders they did not live as First Worldists. The murder of the entire membership of the Proletarian Revolutionary Front led to the murder of most of the leadership of the Lenin-Mao Communist Union; a group of Marxist-Leninists and Maoists dedicated to building a revolutionary base in Arizona. The murder of all these serious revolutionaries in the First world further reinforces our position as Third Worldists, attempts at revolution in the First world even disciplined ones are more likely to end in murder than capturing power. The first Marxists to consider the notion of a Federated-State was the Proletarian Revolutionary Front, we made the mistake of dismissing them, we criticize ourselves for this, it was wrong that we did so; we have been guilty of Liberalism, we apologize. Now we investigate every notion even if we are close to certain that the notion may be incorrect. Our Maoist Comrades made us reconsider much about the Hegelianism that is halting the further development of dialectics. Dialectics is correct, but dialectics can be crippled by incorrect notions such as Hegel's Nation-State.

When our Maoist Comrades managed to explain to us the flaws in the notions by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel we demanded to know how Marxist-Leninists and Maoists had managed to conclude these ideas. Our Maoist Comrades informed us that these ideas came from the Bundist Movement.

The Chairman of the Bundist Movement Dr. Weizfeld came up with the term Auto-determination. The concept behind Auto-determination is basic and correct. Nationalist Self-determination is a colonial contradiction. National-coexisting Auto-determination is the solution to this contradiction. The Nation-States in the Third World can and will hold back a Pan-Third Worldist revolution because Nation-States oppress minority nationalities within the State. The Federated-State can bring about the necessary Coexistent-proletarian Auto-determination of the Third World nationalities that are the real Proletariat. Federated Third World Proletarian States can form a Socialist Global Countryside together.

Social Alienation in the First World

Social alienation in the First World is a problem that is rising at an alarming rate. Take a look at a family today in the First World and young couples living with their parents will text each other at the dinner table.

Marx was initially in the Young Hegelian camp and, like Feuerbach, rejected the spiritual basis, and adapted Hegel's dialectic model to a theory of (historical) materialism. Marx's theory of alienation is articulated most clearly in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology (1846). The 'young' Marx wrote more often and directly of alienation than the 'mature' Marx, which some regard as an ideological break while others maintain that the concept remained central. There is generally held to be a transition from a philosophical-anthropological (Marxist humanism) concept (e.g. internal alienation from the self) to a structural-historical interpretation (e.g. external alienation by appropriation of labor), accompanied by a change in terminology from alienation to exploitation to commodity fetishism and reification.

The issue of Hikikomori in Japan and Incels in America, these are text book examples of Social alienation in the First World. The American nonprofit Southern Poverty Law Center described the Incel subculture as "part of the online male supremacist ecosystem" that is included in their list of hate groups. But we have examined this more closely and have found that this is not really the truth. These Incels suffer with extreme Social alienation in the First World.

The "Loneliness Epidemic" as some call it, is really just Social alienation in the First World. The need to be sociable was hardwired into humanity long ago. The ability to have face-to-face sex is one of those needs, but connection has now been replaced with superficiality and fetishization.

How did Marx's Theory of Social alienation prove so correct to this extent in the First World?
This happened because First Worlders will not fight for liberation.

People in the First World can be bought off, those that know something is wrong don't fully understand the issue. Realizing something is wrong can cause Social alienation if the person realizing this does not fully understand what is happening. The two programs by Alex Jones Infowars and Prison Planet had been the perfect outlet for those looking for answers. The Conspiracy Theory subculture and the Marvel Cinematic Universe subculture are both manifestations of this Social alienation in the First World. Bronyism is another manifestation of Social alienation in the First World.
But is there a solution?

There is a solution but it is an uphill battle, the people in the First World need to resist the Social alienation by facing reality instead of abandoning it. Spreading Social awareness is a good place to start. It is more worthwhile to reach out to isolated people than to isolate them further.    

The Transgender Question

Written by four Trans-Women.  

We have written this together in full collaboration with each other.

We’d like to start off by stating the four of us writing this post are trans people (Fully transitioned).
Two of us feel that the transition was a mistake.  One of us holds mixed feelings about our transition, and one has found satisfaction with their transition.  The one who found satisfaction admits that the reason is because they can hide their homosexuality.  All four of us conclude that both the case of Transgender and the case of Transphobia is manufactured.

Most trans people are gay, lesbian, or bisexual.  Several trans-women are in truth straight males with feminine traits.  The conclusion we have reached is that trans people usually fall under three categories.


#1.  The most common is those gender questioning, whom go to the extreme of opting for surgery.

#2.  Those who have Trans-dysphoria, are the original Tran people, controversially, before the other categories emerged, was the only category.

#3.  Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals shamed for their true sexual orientation.

In most cases, those transitioning from one gender to another, move away from the LGB community.  Transitioning does not change ones sexual orientation, thus a gay man or lesbian will then be a straight woman or straight man.
This is not written to justify transphobia, nor is this intended to insight hate.  Any discrimination towards trans-people is abhorrent and gender-neutral restrooms are logical and should be endorsed.  The questions that should be asked are: Why is the Transgender Cause almost always funded by special interest groups? Why is it, when transgender folk come out to the public, while attempting to denounce frauds in our midst, we get ridiculed by cisgender folk?

The three categories of identifying what a transgender person is, by definition, is correct.  This means that there are no true Transgender people.  Cisgender people push the notion of "transgender", at the same time it is usually white cis-males, whom express violent transphobia.
 

The truth is that gender questioning is perfectly normal and have been inherent for centuries.

As mentioned above, two of us writing this, feel that the transition was a mistake.  One of us transitioned for the wrong reason.  The self-realization, that this was a hidden way to try and win over a lesbian that could not return certain feelings, had to be faced.

This plan didn't work . . . 

Many times cisgender persons will support their transgender friends and then in the middle of transition, their transgender friend will decide to be Gender Neutral.  This causes serious confusion for everyone involved who want to support their Transgender friend.  In the Third World, there are no Trans persons.  Why is the transgender case only seen in the First World?

The Transgender Question can only be concluded as a result of different issues.  The trans persons are a manifestation of several issues surrounding social alienation, and First Worlder’s who are in crisis.  This crisis is not likely to go away, in fact, we should expect to see this expand.  We need to question gender questioning and the questioning of gender roles.
Acknowledging that Gays, Lesbians, and Bisexuals are organic within humanity is needed.

There is no material evidence for the transgender cause.  There might be supernatural evidence for the transgender cause, but that is not science, and this can not be put into the context of Political Science.

Maoism-Third Worldism is better than Marxism-Leninism-Maoism

There is only one way to understand why the theory and practice of Maoism-Third Worldism is better than the theory and practice of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism and that way is full study. First read this: https://maoismthirdworldism.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-ridiculous-hairsplitting-has-forced.html
If you have read that, then you must understand that. Kevin Rashid Johnson is by far the best at disagreeing with Maoism-Third Worldism. Maoism-Third Worldism will only further advance in theory by studying the work of those who are better at criticizing us. As it goes, Kevin Rashid Johnson is good at disagreeing, but he has no true argument. The study of the straw man attacks by Kevin Rashid Johnson will be essential for anyone truly attempting to take up Maoism-Third Worldism as a study. Now that we got that out of the way, we wish to say that Jason Unruhe destroyed Kevin Rashid Johnson, this is evident when you read this: https://maoistrebelnews.com/2015/05/08/kevin-rashid-and-first-worldism-straw-men-are-easy-to-kill/

Marxism-Leninism is called such because Leninism is Marxism updated.
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is called such because Maoism is Marxism-Leninism updated.
Maoism-Third Worldism is called such because Third Worldism is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism updated.

Third Worldism is Maoism-Third Worldism. Maoism-Third Worldism is a sort way of saying Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Third Worldism.

One of the greatest confusions is that some do not understand the difference between Maoism and Mao Zedong Thought. Mao Zedong Thought was Marxism-Leninism applied to feudal China. Maoism is Marxism-Leninism-Maoism. 


Just to avoid any other common confusions; Marxism-Leninism is rarely referred to as simply Leninism because when anyone says "Leninism" this could also mean Trotskyism to several people.


Third Worldism started with the Maoist Internationalist Movement and was furthered by the Leading Light Communist Organization. It is essential to study of the works of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong - a proper study of both Lin Biao and Abimael Guzmán should be taken up first. Then a study of the written work of the Maoist Internationalist Movement and the Leading Light Communist Organization will depart to the student a true understanding of Third Worldism. The Maoist Internationalist Movement made great breakthroughs in revolutionary science but it destroyed it self with a lot of strange ideas that caused it to fracture badly, several correct ideas came from the Maoist Internationalist Movement, several incorrect ideas also came from the Maoist Internationalist Movement. The Leading Light Communist Organization was the true inheritor of the Maoist Internationalist Movement much advancements came from this organization. Anyone who wishes to join the Leading Light Communist Organization should, but we who have built this blog for you to get started hope that you will remain independent from the LLCO and any of the offshoots of MIM. It really needs to be Third Worlders who take up the responsibility of becoming Third Worldists, they must build Vanguard Parties. The First Worlders who become Third Worldists have the responsibility of aiding the Third World Revolutionaries while also sabotaging their own First World Countries. 

We who make this blog do so to give anyone truly interested in Maoism-Third Worldism an correct introduction. We are Third Worldists and we meet up with our rivals who we deeply respect, we meet up four times a year. Our respected rivals are none other than Marxist-Leninist-Maoists. This is the blog of those Maoists: https://marxistleninistmaoisttheory.blogspot.com/ we deeply respect our rivals. This is what they say about Third Worldism: https://marxistleninistmaoisttheory.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-we-think-about-maoism-third.html we disagree with the idea that M3W is MLM defeatism. The true divide between Maosm-Third Worldism and Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is that we Third Worldists reject the book Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat by J. Sakai and we agree with many points in Divided World Divided Class by Zak Cope. Our Maoist rivals on the other hand disagree with most every conclusion of Zak Cope's masterpiece, instead agreeing with most points in J. Sakai's outdated book. Some of the most basic statements in J. Sakai's Settlers book are very much true but the conclusions of that book are ultimately false. To be fair to our Maoist rivals, they do not treat Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat by J. Sakai like their manifesto, just as we don't treat Divided World Divided Class by Zak Cope as our manifesto. 

We struggle with the reality that Maoism-Third Worldism is better than Marxism-Leninism-Maoism. 

Synthesis of Treason

Treason in the First World creates Liberation in the Third World.
There is a way to break the First World without getting destroyed.

Those of us in the First World who are revolutionary need to sabotage everything that the Global First World Rich have. In the Third World the Shanty town is beginning to replace the Countryside. In the First World we need to organize the Urban poor against the police and Military. The children of Mexican migrants who want to get ahead are the most willing to join us. If we can ensure them that our leadership keeps them out of the type of trouble the Drug Cartels would get them into, we have a real chance at organized Treason that breaks the United States. The Urban poor in the First World needs to identify with the Third World Shanty town. Global People's War; Global Countryside. 
We start with Urban study groups. Using the writings of both the Leading Light Communist Organization and the Maoist Internationalist Movement; with a deeper emphasis on the Maoist Internationalist Movement. That is the first pillar to our Theory and Practice in the First World. 
Teaching the poor Urban youth the study of the works of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong is the second pillar to our Theory and Practice in the First World. We also need to keep all writings by Leon Trotsky out of the hands of the Youth; that is the third pillar to our Theory and Practice in the First World. Sabotaging everything that the average First Worlder lives on through organized criminal behavior of theft and destruction of property of the middle class is the fourth pillar to our Theory and Practice in the First World. Making sure that the First World is vulnerable makes possible a Third World invasion of the First World happen; this is the fifth pillar to our Theory and Practice in the First World. Radical Change must come by trying to make things better. Things must get worse. One of the most dangerous populations of the United States of America is the White populations of Louisiana, Georgia and Mississippi. Any attempt at allying with these people is counter-revolutionary, in fact the entire White population of the Southern States is a barrier to revolution. Jim Crow is still a normal thing in those places, the Black populations over there are most useful and most able to get on board with our plans of making treason popular.